Call It Sleep by Henry Roth
Published 1934 · 566 pages · 153,365 words · about 12 hours at an average pace · Literary Fiction
How hard is Call It Sleep to read?
Call It Sleep scores 64 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.
- Vocabulary: 68 out of 100
- Roth operates in two registers simultaneously: the street dialogue is rendered in dense phonetic Yiddish-inflected English ('No akey!', 'Wotcha gonna do wid id?'), while the narrative prose uses elevated literary diction ('the burnished, the shining fathom upon fathom'). Readers must decode both registers, though context usually guides meaning. Closer to Lolita in vocabulary demand than to Ulysses.
- Sentence structure: 72 out of 100
- Narrative sentences are long and Proustian in their subordination, tracking David's shifting perceptions clause by clause. Interior monologue fragments this further with dashes and parenthetical breaks: '(—Down! Run down!) He threw a frightened glance over his shoulder. (—No! Coward! Stay right here!)'. The effect is more rhythmically demanding than standard literary fiction but less extreme than Faulkner's 1,000-word sentences.
- Abstraction: 58 out of 100
- The novel is grounded in concrete tenement experience — fishing coins through cellar grates, riding milk wagons, haggling at candy stores — but David's inner life reaches toward religious and mystical abstraction. The coal from Isaiah's lips, the blue flame at the trolley rail, the cellar darkness: these operate as felt metaphysics, not philosophical discourse. Abstraction is experiential rather than conceptual.
- Information density: 65 out of 100
- Each page carries significant load: multiple language registers, sensory detail of immigrant street life, symbolic resonance of light and darkness, and the constant dual-track of external event and interior response. The final chapter compresses dozens of voices into a torrent. Comparable to Lolita in richness, though with longer stretches of lower density in the middle books.
- Narrative indirection: 72 out of 100
- David is a child who witnesses things he cannot interpret — adults speak of his birth in veiled terms, sexual encounters between children are observed without comprehension, his father's rage has sources the boy cannot access. The reader must read around David's limited understanding to grasp what is actually happening. This double vision, child perception and adult inference, is the primary mode of the novel.
- Symbolic density: 78 out of 100
- Light and darkness organize the entire novel at the structural level: the cellar represents death and terror, the roof represents freedom, the trolley rail's electric arc represents God and transcendence. The burning coal from Isaiah, the rosary beads, the dipper in the milk can all accumulate symbolic weight. Closer to To the Lighthouse in symbolic method than to Heart of Darkness's more schematic allegory.
- Ironic distance: 30 out of 100
- The prose aligns closely with David's terror and wonder — Roth does not hold his narrator at arm's length or deploy irony against his own character. The father's violence is presented as crushing fact, not as material for ironic commentary. What irony exists comes through the gap between David's hopeful misreadings and the reader's fuller understanding.
- Resolution withholding: 70 out of 100
- The novel ends with David's electrocution at the trolley rail — a climax that is simultaneously physical collapse and visionary transcendence. What exactly David experiences, and whether it constitutes salvation or breakdown, is left genuinely open. The domestic conflict with Albert is not resolved, merely suspended. The ending refuses the satisfactions of either tragedy or epiphany.
- Structural complexity: 65 out of 100
- The novel is organized in four titled books tracking different periods of David's childhood, each anchored to a location (the cellar, the street, the cheder, the rails). Within this clear macro-structure, individual scenes fracture between external narration and interior monologue, Yiddish translated to elevated English, and a final chapter that rushes through at least a dozen distinct voices and perspectives without transition.
How Call It Sleep is regarded
Call It Sleep holds a literary regard score of 68 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.