ReadingRate vs Goodreads

At a glance

Where Goodreads is genuinely better

Community. Nothing else comes close. If a book exists, someone on Goodreads has reviewed it — usually thousands of someones — and that archive of opinions is the most useful thing Goodreads owns. Reviews from ordinary readers, accumulated over nearly two decades, are why people stay, and no newer app (ours included) can match that volume.

It is also free, your friends are on it, and its yearly reading challenge is a genuinely effective ritual. If those are the things you care about, you do not need an alternative, and switching would cost you more than it gains.

Where ReadingRate is different

ReadingRate starts from a different question: not "what did everyone think of this book?" but "how do you actually read?" You log pages, and the app turns that into reading speed, pace trends, and a predicted finish date for every book on your shelf — computed from your own history, not a site-wide average.

Books get measured, not just rated. Every book is scored on nine difficulty dimensions — vocabulary, sentence structure, abstraction, information density, and five interpretive dimensions like narrative indirection and symbolic density — plus a literary-regard profile of how critics and the canon treat it. That is how you find out a book is a three-week commitment before page one, not after page fifty.

The texture is different too: no ads anywhere, a shelf scanner that adds books from one photo of your bookcase, a built-in EPUB reader for books you own, and an AI reading companion (a membership feature) that knows what you have read and logged. And it ships — the product changes month to month, which is not something anyone has said about Goodreads recently.

Recommendations: your history, not the crowd's

Goodreads recommends from community signals — star averages, what is popular, what people who bought this also bought (it is owned by Amazon, and it shows). That works when your taste matches the crowd's. It fails precisely where taste is personal: a four-star average tells you the average reader liked it, and nobody reads the way you do.

ReadingRate builds recommendations from two things only: your own reading history — what you finished, abandoned, rated, and how fast — and what we actually know about each book, from its difficulty profile to its genre and standing. No crowd average sits between you and the suggestion. The more you log, the more the recommendations become yours rather than everyone's.

Tracking a book vs. keeping it

Here is the difference that matters most to us, and the one hardest to see in a feature table. Every tracker on the market records books one after another; your history becomes a list — a series of disconnected dots. Ask yourself what you actually retain from a book you finished four months ago: the plot in one sentence, maybe a character's name, rarely a line.

ReadingRate treats finishing as the midpoint, not the end. The quotes and reflections you saved resurface for recall practice, so the lines that struck you stay yours. Semantic connections surface passages from earlier books that resonate with what you are reading now, so the dots join up. Character maps keep a book's cast recoverable long after you have moved on. And every book sits inside a map of its tradition — its era, its genre's machinery, its place on the Frye atlas — so you can understand what a book is doing within its lineage, and say so in a conversation, months later, with the quote to hand.

This is why we say ReadingRate leans academic, in the best sense: not homework, but the difference between having read a book and knowing it. If a shelf and a yearly count are all you want, Goodreads does that for free. If you read to understand and remember, that is the job we built this for.

This isn't either/or

Nothing about using ReadingRate requires leaving Goodreads. Plenty of readers keep Goodreads for reviews and the people they follow, and use ReadingRate for the tracking and analytics Goodreads never built — the CSV import exists precisely so both can hold the same library. A reading life usually runs on a small stack of tools; this is one of them, not a demand to switch.

Switching is a CSV, not a project

Goodreads lets you export your entire library as a CSV file, and ReadingRate imports that file directly — books, read dates, and ratings. Your history comes with you in minutes.

It also goes the other way: ReadingRate exports your library as a CSV compatible with both Goodreads and StoryGraph, so trying it does not lock you in.

The import path: Goodreads → My Books → Import and export → Export library. Then upload the CSV at readingrate.com/import/goodreads. Books, read dates, and ratings come across; a CSV export back out is available anytime.

Choose Goodreads if

• You mainly want to read other people's reviews before buying a book
• Your friends are on it and the social shelf is the point
• You want the yearly reading-challenge ritual and nothing more
• Your reading is happily casual — a shelf, not a study
• Free with ads is a fine trade for you

Choose ReadingRate if

• You want real analytics: reading speed, pace trends, predicted finish dates
• You want to know how hard a book is before you commit to it
• You would rather photograph your shelf than type in every book
• You read EPUBs and want reading and tracking in one place
• You want a product that is ad-free and still being built

Bring your Goodreads history with you

Export your library from Goodreads, upload the CSV, and your books, dates, and ratings arrive in minutes. Tracking is free.

Start free

Frequently asked

Is there an app that helps you remember what you read?

That is the part of ReadingRate we care most about. Quotes and reflections you save resurface for recall practice, semantic connections link passages across your whole library — so the book you are reading now connects to the ones you finished — and character maps keep a book's cast recoverable months later. Trackers record that you read a book; this is built so you still know the book afterwards.

Is ReadingRate better than Goodreads?

It depends what you want. Goodreads has a far larger community and review archive — if reviews are the point, stay there. ReadingRate is better at analytics: it computes your reading speed and predicted finish dates from your own logs, scores every book's difficulty on nine dimensions, has no ads, and is actively developed. Many readers use Goodreads for reviews and ReadingRate for tracking.

Can I import my Goodreads library into ReadingRate?

Yes. Export your library from Goodreads as a CSV (Goodreads → My Books → Import and export), then upload it at readingrate.com/import/goodreads. Books, read dates, and ratings come across. You can also export your ReadingRate library back out as a CSV at any time.

Is ReadingRate free?

Tracking your reading — your library, page logs, reading speed, and finish-date predictions — is free. Membership (€10/month or €100/year, with a free trial) adds the deeper performance analytics and AI features. There are no ads on either tier.

Does Goodreads have reading analytics?

Only lightly: a yearly challenge counter and a year-in-review summary. It does not track reading speed, predict finish dates, or measure book difficulty. Those are the gaps ReadingRate was built to fill.

Explore the features mentioned

• Import your Goodreads library
• The Frye atlas of literature
• Literary eras
• Browse the catalog