Docherty by William McIlvanney

Published 1975 · 324 pages · 81,000 words · about 9 hours at an average pace · Literary Fiction

How hard is Docherty to read?

Docherty scores 50 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.

Vocabulary: 48 out of 100
McIlvanney writes in Scottish English with dialect and mining vocabulary. The language is rich and specific to its community.
Sentence structure: 50 out of 100
Muscular, considered prose that captures both speech and thought. McIlvanney is sentences are substantial but clear.
Abstraction: 50 out of 100
Grounded in the physical reality of mining life—the work, the town, the bodies. Abstract themes of class and dignity emerge through lived experience.
Information density: 55 out of 100
The novel builds its community detail by detail. McIlvanney gives you time to know the Dochertys and their world.
Narrative indirection: 50 out of 100
McIlvanney shows his community through action and dialogue. What Tam Docherty believes is revealed through how he lives.
Symbolic density: 55 out of 100
The mines, Tam is fists, the books Conn reads—McIlvanney builds meaning through images of labor and aspiration.
Ironic distance: 45 out of 100
McIlvanney writes with fierce respect for his working-class subjects. The irony is directed at those who would diminish them.
Resolution withholding: 50 out of 100
Lives are lived; the community changes but persists. The ending honors continuity rather than dramatic resolution.
Structural complexity: 50 out of 100
A family saga following multiple generations. The structure is expansive, building a portrait of a community over time.

How Docherty is regarded

Docherty holds a literary regard score of 48 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.

About the author

William McIlvanney