Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing by Miranda Fricker
Published 2007 · 52,800 words · about 5 hours at an average pace
How hard is Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing to read?
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing scores 66 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.
- Vocabulary: 72 out of 100
- Analytic-philosophy vocabulary with newly coined terms.
- Sentence structure: 68 out of 100
- Precise, carefully qualified academic sentences.
- Abstraction: 82 out of 100
- A new concept built and defended abstractly.
- Information density: 72 out of 100
- Sustained argument with literary and legal cases.
How Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing is regarded
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing holds a literary regard score of 70 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.