Far From True (Promise Falls, #2)
Published 2016 · 105,000 words · about 5 hours at an average pace · crime fiction, mystery, thriller, suspense
How hard is Far From True (Promise Falls, #2) to read?
Far From True (Promise Falls, #2) scores 26 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it relatively accessible. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.
- Vocabulary: 25 out of 100
- Barclay writes in clean, accessible thriller prose. The language is contemporary and conversational — the vocabulary of a newspaper reporter and small-town residents, with no specialized jargon or unusual register. Everyday nouns dominate; readers will not pause for definitions.
- Sentence structure: 22 out of 100
- Sentences are short to medium length, structured for pace rather than complexity. Barclay favors declarative constructions and rapid dialogue exchanges. Clause-nesting is minimal. The prose is engineered to carry readers from chapter to chapter without friction.
- Abstraction: 18 out of 100
- The narrative is almost entirely concrete: crime scenes, surveillance, confrontations, domestic interiors. Barclay trusts physical detail and action over reflection or concept. Characters do occasionally brood on loss or betrayal, but these passages are brief and grounded in specific memory.
- Information density: 38 out of 100
- Multiple parallel storylines require readers to track several sets of characters, timelines, and developing mysteries simultaneously. Individual scenes are not dense, but the cumulative information load — connecting dots across plotlines — is moderate for the genre.
- Narrative indirection: 32 out of 100
- The novel uses rotating third-person POV chapters across several characters, which creates mild complexity as readers reconstruct the full picture from partial perspectives. There is no unreliable narration and no fragmented timeline, but the withholding of connections between storylines creates productive confusion.
- Symbolic density: 12 out of 100
- The Promise Falls setting carries some symbolic weight — the dying small town as a microcosm of decay — but this operates as backdrop rather than sustained allegory. The drive-in theater collapse is more plot mechanism than symbol. Barclay is not a writer who layers meaning through imagery.
- Ironic distance: 12 out of 100
- The narrative voice is direct and earnest. There is no gap between surface meaning and intended meaning; Barclay's prose says what it means. Minor dry humor occasionally surfaces in dialogue but never undermines the sincerity of the thriller machinery.
- Resolution withholding: 42 out of 100
- As the middle installment in a trilogy, the novel deliberately withholds overarching resolution. Individual storylines reach local conclusions, but the deeper mystery of what is wrong with Promise Falls remains open. The ending is engineered to pull readers into the third book.
- Structural complexity: 32 out of 100
- The novel alternates between several POV characters in relatively short chapters — a standard multi-protagonist thriller structure. The parallel storylines eventually converge, which requires readers to hold multiple threads. Not experimentally complex, but more architecturally involved than single-POV crime fiction.
How Far From True (Promise Falls, #2) is regarded
Far From True (Promise Falls, #2) holds a literary regard score of 14 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.