Human, All Too Human by Friedrich Nietzsche
Published 1878 · 90,993 words · about 9 hours at an average pace · Nonfiction, Philosophy, Essays & Criticism
How many words are on a page? A ReadingRate study
How hard is Human, All Too Human to read?
Human, All Too Human scores 67 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.
- Vocabulary: 60 out of 100
- Zimmern's translation is formal and Victorian, with Latin and French tags, Greek terms and talk of 'dæmons' and 'metaphysical need'. Everyday words carry the load, so it is lighter than Moby-Dick but denser than The Great Gatsby.
- Sentence structure: 62 out of 100
- The preface and longer aphorisms run in long periodic sentences full of dashes and nested clauses, as in the one-sentence account of the 'great emancipation'. The short maxims such as 'The ascetic makes a necessity of virtue' are crisp, so it falls between Anna Karenina and The Great Gatsby.
- Abstraction: 84 out of 100
- Metaphysics, free will, the thing-in-itself and the genealogy of morals dominate, with only occasional images such as the waterfall or Pandora's jar. It is nearly as conceptual as Notes from Underground but less dramatised.
- Information density: 74 out of 100
- Nearly every numbered section introduces a new claim, reference or reversal, drawing on Greek religion, La Rochefoucauld, Schopenhauer, music history and physiology. The short form keeps it digestible, though density is still higher than Atomic Habits.
- Argumentative complexity: 66 out of 100
- Nietzsche builds a long case that all opposites are sublimations, so morality, religion and art share base origins. Individual aphorisms are brief, but the arguments run across sections and are rarely spelled out step by step. It is less formal than Of Grammatology but harder than The Second Sex.
- Prerequisite knowledge: 68 out of 100
- He assumes Schopenhauer, Kant, Wagner, Paul Rée, La Rochefoucauld and Greek tragedy without introduction. A reader gets by without them, but much of the polemic loses its target.
- Terminological opacity: 52 out of 100
- Terms such as 'thing-in-itself', 'metaphysical need', 'intelligible freedom', 'esse and operari' and 'dividuum' appear, but Nietzsche mostly uses plain words with ironic twists. It is less jargon-laden than Orientalism's Foucauldian vocabulary.
- Rhetorical indirection: 66 out of 100
- Irony, provocation and masks run through the book, from the invented 'free spirits' to the praise of suicide and the dismissal of pity. Readers must decide where he is sincere, so it is more oblique than Orientalism and nearer to Mythologies.
- Systemic scope: 76 out of 100
- He ranges across philosophy, psychology, physiology, anthropology, religion, aesthetics, music, politics and literary criticism within a single aphoristic frame. It is broader than Orientalism and narrower than Aesthetic Theory.