Magic Realism, New Objectivity, and the Arts during the Weimar Republic by Irene Guenther

Published 1995 · 75,000 words · about 6 hours at an average pace · Essays & Criticism

How hard is Magic Realism, New Objectivity, and the Arts during the Weimar Republic to read?

Magic Realism, New Objectivity, and the Arts during the Weimar Republic scores 61 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.

Vocabulary: 65 out of 100
Historical and art-historical vocabulary alongside literary criticism; demands familiarity with Weimar culture.
Sentence structure: 58 out of 100
Abstraction: 66 out of 100
Historically grounded rather than purely theoretical; abstract claims are anchored in cultural-historical evidence.
Information density: 72 out of 100
Dense with historical, artistic, and literary evidence from an unfamiliar cultural context.
Narrative indirection: 14 out of 100
Argument is direct and revisionist; the book states its challenge to received narratives clearly.
Symbolic density: 18 out of 100
Analysis of how German magic realism makes the ordinary strange through visual and symbolic estrangement.
Ironic distance: 18 out of 100
Historical irony in demonstrating that a supposedly Latin American mode originated in interwar Europe.
Resolution withholding: 11 out of 100
The revisionist argument is stated and demonstrated with scholarly clarity.
Structural complexity: 34 out of 100
Organized chronologically through Weimar cultural history with attention to multiple media.

How Magic Realism, New Objectivity, and the Arts during the Weimar Republic is regarded

Magic Realism, New Objectivity, and the Arts during the Weimar Republic holds a literary regard score of 71 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.

About the author

Irene Guenther