Parody by Simon Dentith

Published 2000 · 224 pages · 65,403 words · about 5 hours at an average pace · Essays & Criticism

How hard is Parody to read?

Parody scores 68 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.

Vocabulary: 72 out of 100
Dentith deploys standard literary-critical vocabulary throughout—heteroglossia, carnivalesque, hypotaxis, Bakhtinian dialogism, burlesque, travesty—alongside period-specific terms like 'Euphuism', 'poetomachia', and 'Newgate novel'. A reader without some grounding in literary theory will encounter terminology every few pages, though definitions are usually supplied in context.
Sentence structure: 62 out of 100
Sentences are academic in register: subordinate clauses build argument incrementally, and parenthetical qualifications are common. The prose stays readable—closer to The Great Gatsby end of the spectrum than to James or Proust—but the sustained argumentation requires close attention to follow the logical thread across long paragraphs.
Abstraction: 78 out of 100
The book is primarily theoretical. Dentith moves between close-reading specific texts (Tom Jones, As You Like It, Hamlet) and broad claims about parody's social function, its relationship to Bakhtinian carnival, and its role in postmodern culture. The final chapters on postmodernism and cultural politics operate at a high level of generality, debating whether parody constitutes a 'cultural dominant' in Jameson's terms.
Information density: 75 out of 100
Each chapter covers multiple centuries and dozens of texts; the book on parody discusses Aristophanes, Cervantes, Fielding, Austen, Thackeray, Dickens, Joyce, and The Simpsons across 200-odd pages. Theoretical frameworks (Bakhtin, Jameson, Linda Hutcheon) are introduced and applied without extended exposition. Readers must track several interlocking arguments simultaneously.
Narrative indirection: 25 out of 100
This is discursive non-fiction: Dentith states his arguments directly. His thesis—that parody is a socially embedded practice, not merely a formal technique—is announced early and restated throughout. There is no narrator whose reliability must be weighed, and the reader is not required to infer unstated positions.
Symbolic density: 15 out of 100
Dentith's prose carries no symbolic freight. The argument moves through historical example and theoretical claim rather than image or allegory. Individual quotations from parodic texts carry their own wit, but Dentith's own expository writing is free of symbolic layer.
Ironic distance: 40 out of 100
Writing about parody demands some awareness of the mode, and Dentith is alert to the irony of offering a serious scholarly account of a subversive practice. Occasional dry wit surfaces—noting, for instance, that karaoke 'too can be a mode of empowerment, if that does not seem too preposterous a claim'. But the gap between stated and intended meaning is narrow; the book does not undercut its own arguments.
Resolution withholding: 35 out of 100
Dentith concludes with a position: parody has no inherent politics, cannot be assigned a stable ideological function, and must be analysed case by case. This is a genuine intellectual conclusion rather than deliberate withholding. Some questions about postmodernism's relationship to parody are left open, but as acknowledged critical problems, not as artistic ambiguity.
Structural complexity: 30 out of 100
The book follows a broadly chronological structure: antiquity, the novel, the Elizabethan stage, poetry, the postmodern. Cross-references between chapters are frequent and clearly flagged. There are no formal experiments, no timeline disruptions, and no unreliable perspectives. Navigation is straightforward.

How Parody is regarded

Parody holds a literary regard score of 39 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.

About the author

Simon Dentith