The Kindness of Birds
Published 2021 · 216 pages · 61,861 words · about 5 hours at an average pace
How hard is The Kindness of Birds to read?
The Kindness of Birds scores 65 out of 100 for difficulty on ReadingRate, making it quite demanding. The score is a weighted composite of nine measures: four of how hard the prose is to parse, five of how hard the meaning is to extract.
- Vocabulary: 55 out of 100
- The book utilizes a literary vocabulary, incorporating some foreign words and phrases (e.g., Cuerpo presente, Ay, Utak bolinao) that may be unfamiliar to the average reader. However, the context generally clarifies the meaning, preventing the vocabulary from becoming overly obscure, placing it near Pedro Paramo in complexity.
- Sentence structure: 58 out of 100
- The sentences in "The Kindness of Birds" vary in length and structure, with some containing nested clauses and complex grammatical constructions. While not as extreme as the Jamesian hypotaxis found in "The Golden Bowl", the text requires careful attention to follow the relationships between ideas, making it slightly more complex than "The Great Gatsby".
- Abstraction: 68 out of 100
- The book blends concrete narratives with philosophical and theoretical content, exploring themes of memory, identity, and social justice. While grounded in specific characters and settings, the text also delves into deeper questions about the human condition, placing it between "2666" and "Brothers Karamazov" in its level of abstraction.
- Information density: 62 out of 100
- The text presents a moderate amount of concepts per page, requiring some attention from the reader. While not as dense as "War and Peace" with its multiple plotlines and historical backdrop, "The Kindness of Birds" offers a rich texture of ideas and observations that demand more focus than a purely plot-driven novel.
- Narrative indirection: 70 out of 100
- The narrative often relies on implication and inference, requiring the reader to actively construct meaning. While not as extreme as "Pedro Paramo" where reality is uncertain, the text uses unreliable narrators and fragmented memories to create a sense of ambiguity, demanding that the reader read against the surface to uncover deeper truths, similar to "Lolita".
- Symbolic density: 72 out of 100
- The book employs a significant amount of symbolism, with motifs and allegories enriching the literal events. Birds, in particular, serve as potent symbols of freedom, kindness, and memory, while other elements like colors and objects carry deeper meanings, approaching the level of "The Great Gatsby" in its symbolic weight.
- Ironic distance: 60 out of 100
- The text maintains a moderate level of ironic distance, creating a gap between what is said and what is meant. While not overtly satirical like "The Sellout", the book uses subtle irony to critique social norms and explore the complexities of human relationships, positioning it between "The Great Gatsby" and "Brothers Karamazov" in its ironic framing.
- Resolution withholding: 70 out of 100
- The book resists easy closure, leaving some ambiguities and open endings. While not as extreme as "2666" with its unsolved mysteries, the text withholds complete resolution to encourage reflection on the themes of memory, identity, and social justice, making it similar to "Lolita" in its open meaning.
- Structural complexity: 60 out of 100
- The book features some structural complexity, including timeline jumps and shifts in perspective. While not as experimental as "Flights" with its discontinuous fragments, the text employs non-linear storytelling to create a sense of fragmentation and memory, placing it near "Midnight's Children" in its structural approach.
How The Kindness of Birds is regarded
The Kindness of Birds holds a literary regard score of 12 out of 100, weighing its place in the canon, its critical reception, its influence on other writers, and the standing of its author. Regard is measured separately from difficulty: a demanding book is not necessarily an admired one.